Researcher Advocates 'Student-Centered' Approach to Science Education

A group of educational researchers at Florida State University are drawing widespread attention after their paper measuring the superior results of a more “student-centered” approach to teaching science was published in the pre-eminent journal Science.

Credit: Florida State University
Credit: Florida State University

The stakes are extraordinarily high, so it is critical that the United States find more effective ways of teaching the so-called STEM fields (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) in K-12 classrooms, said the paper’s lead author, Ellen Granger.

“By many measures, the United States is not making much, if any, progress in science and math learning,” said Granger, who is director of Florida State’s Office of Science Teaching Activities and co-director of FSU-Teach. “Ultimately, this has the potential to put us at a global economic disadvantage, in addition to not preparing our students for their adult roles in dealing with the many future societal issues that will have their foundations in science.

”Working with five colleagues, Granger compared science instruction as it looks in most U.S. elementary school classrooms today — what’s known as “teacher-centered instruction” — with the “student-centered instruction” recently called for by the National Research Council of the National Academies.

The FSU researchers found that students who received student-centered instruction scored higher on tests measuring content knowledge and had a better understanding of the processes of science inquiry than those who were taught in the more traditional teacher-centered classrooms. Their findings were documented in the paper “The Efficacy of Student-Centered Instruction in Supporting Science Learning.”

Ellen Granger is director of Florida State’s Office of Science Teaching Activities and co-director of FSU-Teach.Ellen Granger is director of Florida State’s Office of Science Teaching Activities and co-director of FSU-Teach.

The study was a large-scale, randomized control trial comparing these two approaches using a space science unit. A total of 125 fourth- and fifth-grade teachers and their 2,600 students participated — half in the teacher-centered (control) group and half in the student-centered (experimental) group.

In the teacher-centered model that is prevalent today, the act of “sense making” — mentally processing and developing an understanding of complex problems, then working toward solutions — is done by the teachers and relayed to their students through lectures and/or readings. They may also use hands-on activities, but usually these simply confirm what the teacher has already told the students.

“In teacher-centered instruction, the students do not have to do much thinking — they just follow the recipe,” Granger said.

By contrast, in student-centered instruction, the teacher acts as a facilitator to support and guide students as they engage in scientific practices — the students are doing the sense making. This kind of teaching is difficult and requires high-quality professional development, but it tends to result in a deeper understanding of scientific principles and improved reasoning skills among students, Granger said.

Among the study’s findings:

  • Children in the student-centered group scored significantly higher on content knowledge, knowledge about models and evidence in science, and understanding of science inquiry than students in the teacher-centered group. Some of these gains were still present above those of the teacher-centered group more than five months later.
  • Statistical models support the concept that learning science using models and evidence to back up ideas indirectly supports content knowledge gains.
  • In both groups of teachers, their scores were like a “dosage effect” for student outcomes, suggesting that student-centeredness is a feature of more effective teaching. The researchers used videos to ensure that teachers were faithful to either the student-center or teacher-centered approach, which previous studies had not addressed.

In addition to Granger, the research team consisted of Todd Bevis, a research associate in the Office of Science Teaching Activities; Yavuz Saka, a former FSU postdoctoral researcher now teaching at Bülent Ecevit University in Turkey; Professor Sherry Southerland of FSU’s School of Teacher Education, who also co-directs FSU-Teach with Granger; Victor Sampson, an assistant professor in the School of Teacher Education; and Richard Tate, a retired College of Education faculty member specializing in applied statistics and measurement.


Religious creationists are the one of the biggest detriments to the scientific education of American children.

I couldn’t agree more.

I received much appreciation for the custom essays I received from, so I must thank the professional writer for bringing fame to me.

Double Glazing Preston
I like what your blog stands for. this is my first time and here and I am pleased that i was able to find such an excellent resource for travel information. i have bookmarked your site and will be back to what new blog posts you create moving forward.

Informal science education is the science teaching and learning that occurs outside of the formal school curriculum in places such as museums, the media, and community-based programs. The National Science Teachers Association has created a position statement on Informal Science Education to define and 640-822 Braindumps encourage science learning in many contexts and throughout the lifespan. Research in informal science education is funded in the United States by the National Science Foundation.640-816 Braindumps

Ellen Granger played her role in betterment of science for past few weeks. She is symbol of enthusiasm and can be defined in sort words on my favorite blog with full biography and core of applications that she adopted last month. She is becoming the brighter star among several politicians by her motivation and work methodology.

Higher education in particular,is undergoing a transition towards open education; e-learning alone is currently growing at 14 times the rate of traditional learning.Open education is fast growing to become the dominant form of education,for many reasons such as its efficiency and results compared to traditional 350-001
methods.Cost of education has been an issue throughout history,and a major political issue in most countries today.Open education is generally significantly cheaper than traditional campus based learning and in many cases even free. 70-410

Eventually, this has the possibility to put us at a worldwide budgetary impediment persuasive speech topic, notwithstanding not setting up our people for their grown-up parts in managing the numerous future societal issues that will have their establishments in science.

Your article has proven useful to me. It’s very informative and you are obviously very knowledgeable in this area. You have opened my eyes to varying views on this topic with interesting and solid content.
buy soundcloud plays